Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kamalakannan, M.
- Efficacy of Proprioception Training for Tibiofemoral Arthritis in Relation with Pain and Functional Disability
Abstract Views :181 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
M. Kamalakannan
1,
Karthik
1
Affiliations
1 Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Chennai, IN
1 Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Chennai, IN
Source
Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, Vol 12, No 3 (2019), Pagination: 995-998Abstract
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effects of proprioception training in reducing the pain and to improve the activity of daily living for subjects with tibiofemoral arthritis. Individuals with knee pain were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Detailed procedure were explained in patient’s words, informed consent were obtained from all the participants. Procedure were clearly explained to the patient by providing information sheet and informed consent were obtained from all the participants prior to the initiation of procedure. Pre and post test with Numerical pain rating scale and Western Ontario MCMaster universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The collected data was tabulated and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. From the result, it was concluded that Proprioception training with interferential therapy (Group-A) is more effective than (Group-B) in decreasing pain and improving activity of daily living.Keywords
Knee Osteoarthritis, Physiotherapy, Proprioception Training, Wobbleboard, Minitrampoline Exercise.
References
- Sharma L. Proprioception in osteoarthritis. In: Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander LS, editors. Osteoarthritis Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003 ;2nd ed: p. 172–7.
- Bennell KL, Hinman RS, Metcalf BR, Crossley KM, Buchbinder R, Smith M, et al. Relationship of knee joint proprioception to pain and disability in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res 2003;21(2):792–7.
- Pai Y, Zev Rymer W, Chang RW, Sharma L. Effect of age and osteoarthritis on knee proprioception. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40(3):22-60
- Sharma L, Pai YC. Impaired proprioception and osteoarthritis[review]. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1997;9(5):253–8.
- Sharma L. Proprioceptive impairment in knee osteoarthritis[review]. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1999;25(1):299–313.
- Barrett DS, Cobb AG, Bentley G. Joint proprioception in normal, osteoarthritic and replaced knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br1991;73(2):53–6.
- Sharma L. The role of proprioceptive deficits, ligamentous laxity, and malalignment in development and progression ofknee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl 2004;7(3):87–92.
- Garsden LR, Bullock-Saxton JE. Joint reposition sense in subjects with unilateral osteoarthritis of the knee. Clinical Rehab 1999;13(2):148–55.
- Bennell KL, Hinman RS, Metcalf BR. Relationship of knee joint proprioception to pain and disability in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res. 2003;21(2):792-797.
- Bernier JN, Perrin DH. Effect of coordination training on proprioception of the functionally unstable ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27(1):264-275.
- Birmingham TB, Inglis JT, Kramer JF, Vandervoort AA. Effect of a neoprene sleeve on knee joint kinesthesis: influence of different testing procedures. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32(3):304-308.
- Lephart SM, Pincivero DM, Rozzi SL. Proprioception of the ankle and knee. Sports Med. 1998;25(3):149-155.
- Skinner HB, Barrack RL, Cook SD. Age-related decline in proprioception. Perrin, P.P activities Clin Orthop 1984;184:208-11.
- Sharma L, Pai YC, Holtkamp K, Rymer WZ. Is knee joint proprioception worse in the arthritic knee versus the unaffected knee in unilateral knee osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum 1997;40(10):1518-25.
- Barrack RL, Skinner HB, Cook SD. Proprioception of the knee joint. Paradoxical effect of training. Am J Phys Med 1984; 63: 175-81.
- Bernauer EM, Walby WF, Ertl AC, Dempster PT, Bond M, Greenleaf JE. Knee-joint proprioception during 30-day 6 degrees head-down bed rest with isotonic and isokinetic exercise training. Aviat Space Environ Med 1994;65(12):1110-5.
- Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61:422-8. Bellamy N. Pain assessment in osteoarthritis: experience with the WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1989;18(3):14-7.
- Efficacy of Bare Foot Exercise Versus Common Footwear Exercise in Subjects with Plantar Fasciitis
Abstract Views :180 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, SIMATS, Chennai, IN
1 Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, SIMATS, Chennai, IN
Source
Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, Vol 12, No 3 (2019), Pagination: 1039-1043Abstract
The aim of the study is to determine the efficacy of barefoot exercise vs. common footwear exercise in subjects with plantar fasciitis. An objective of the study is to find the efficacy of barefoot exercise versus common footwear exercise on pain with numerical pain rating scale among subjects with plantar fasciitis and to find the efficacy of barefoot exercise versus common footwear exercise on balance outcome measure for elder rehabilitation (BOOMER) among subjects with plantar fasciitis. Methodology: 20 patients with plantar fasciitis were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The collected data were tabulated and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. To all parameters mean and standard deviation (SD) was used. Paired t-test was used to analyze significant changes within the groups. Unpaired t-test was used to analyze significant changes between the two groups. It has been concluded that barefoot exercise (GROUP A) is more effective than common footwear exercise (GROUP B) in decreasing pain, and increasing balance in subjects with plantar fasciitis.Keywords
Bare Foot Exercise, Common Footwear, Plantar Fasciitis, BOOMER, Intrinsic Muscles of the Foot.References
- Selvaraj Sudhakar, Veena Kirthika. S, Padmanabhan. K, C.V. Senthil Nathan, S. Ramachandran, V. Rajalaxmi, S. Sowmiya, P. Senthil Selvam. Which is efficient in improving postural control among the novice runners? Isolated ankle strengthening or functional balance training programme: A randomized controlled trial. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(4): 1461-1466.
- Hunter S, Thompson M, Adams R et al. Relationships among age-associated strength changes and physical activity level, limb dominance, and muscle group in women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000;55(A):264–273.
- Robbins S, Waked E, McClaren J. Proprioception and stability: Foot position awareness as a function of age and footwear. Age Ageing 1995; 24:67–72. Hunter S, Thompson M, Adams R et al. Relationships among age-associated strength changes and physical activity level, limb dominance, and muscle group in women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000;55(A):264–273.
- Robbins S, Waked E, Allard P et al. Foot position awareness in younger and older men: The influence of footwear sole properties. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45(3):61–66.
- Waddington G, Adams R. Discrimination of active plantarflexion and inversion movements after an ankle injury. Aust J Physiother 1999;45(3):7–13.
- American Geriatrics Society. AGS and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention. Guideline for the Prevention of Falls in Older Persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49(5):664–671.
- Balogun J, Adesinasi C, Marzouk D. The effects of a wobble board exercise training program on static balance performance and strength of lower extremity muscles. Physiother Can 1992;44(5):23–30.
- Nordt WE 3rd, Sachatello SA, Plotkin ES et al. The effects of single-axis balance board intervention on balance parameters in the elderly. Am J Orthop 1999;28(8):447–450.
- Ashton-Miller J, Wojtys E, Huston L et al. Can proprioception really be improved by exercises? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol 2001;9(1):128–136.
- Gilsing M, Van Den Bosch C, Lee C et al. Effects of age on the reliability of detecting ankle inversion and eversion. Age Ageing 1995;24(6):58–66.
- Waddington G, Seward H, Wrigley T et al. Comparing wobble-board and jump-landing training effects on the knee and ankle. J Sci Med Sports 2000;3(2):435–445.
- Waddington G, Adams R, Jones A. Wobble board (ankle disc) training effects on discrimination of inversion movements. Aust J Physiother 1999;45(1):95–101.
- Chen H-C, Ashton-Miller J, Alexander N et al. Stepping over obstacles. Gait patterns of healthy young and old adults. J Gerontol 1991;46(9):196–203.
- Robbins S, Waked E. Factors associated with ankle injuries: Preventative measures. Sports Med 1998;25(8):63–72.
- Waddington G, Adams R. Textured insole effects on ankle movement discrimination while wearing athletic shoes. Phys Ther Sport 2000;1(2):119–128.
- Lake M. Determining the protective function of sports footwear. Ergonomics 2000;43(3):1610–1621.
- Arnadottir S, Mercer V. Effects of footwear on measurements of balance and gait in women between the ages of 65 and 93 years. Phys Ther 2000;80(2):17–27.
- Annesi J. Effects of computer feedback on adherence to exercise. Perceptual Motor Skills 1998;87(2):723–730.
- Swets J, Dawes R, Monahan J. Better decisions through science. Sci Am 2000;283(18):82–87.
- Hills M, Armitage P. The two-period cross-over clinical trial. Br J Clin Pharma-col 1979;8(8):7–20.
- Frena Patel, Vishal Acharya. Does Young Indian Save for Retirement? Asian J. Management; 2017; 8(3):455-459.